Peter Johnson have you shunned me?
I feel a little akward about blogging this, but I feel it is the only way to gain the attention of one "Peter Johnson." I've tried, for many months, to be content with the idea that PJ does not comment on nor perhaps even READ my blog. You, out there in blogland, you cannot imagine how this makes me feel. You and yours living every day of life knowing that PJ reads your blog, thinks about it, and develops a witty-sarcastic-factbased comment that he lovingly posts to your blog. So you receive an email. An anonymous poster has commented. Oh how excited you must be - to scroll to the bottom of words too big for you [me] to recognize and see, there, in all its lonesome...
PJ
Like his initials, I too can be found at the bottom of a paragraph of [jibberish] I... simply alone... waiting for the comments I will never recieve. Here I am Peter. I am right here. I am lonesome.
MH
PJ
Like his initials, I too can be found at the bottom of a paragraph of [jibberish] I... simply alone... waiting for the comments I will never recieve. Here I am Peter. I am right here. I am lonesome.
MH


2 Comments:
At 6:05 pm,
Blaine said…
Meghan,
Maybe if you blogged with a frequency higher than once ever every 2-4 weeks people might pay more attention.
By the way, thank you for once again proving my theory that "maybe" means "no." Last saturday was the clincher. It is now a law.
Reeder's Law Of "Maybe" Means "No"
Soon to be followed by several corollaries that liberally use the word "whore" in the title.
That is all.
Blaine
At 7:28 pm,
SafeCracker said…
Hands off wench, he's mine.
Post a Comment
<< Home